Tο Βερολίνο ζητάει εξηγήσεις από την Ουάσιγκτον για το PRISM

Αν δεν έχει κατηγορία γι'αυτό βάλτε το εδώ...
Απάντηση
Άβαταρ μέλους
MacPap
Δημοσιεύσεις: 6896
Εγγραφή: 08 Ιούλ 2010, 03:00

Tο Βερολίνο ζητάει εξηγήσεις από την Ουάσιγκτον για το PRISM

Δημοσίευση από MacPap »

Tο Βερολίνο θα ζητήσει εξηγήσεις από την Ουάσιγκτον για το πρόγραμμα PRISM

Ο υπουργός Εσωτερικών της Γερμανίας Χανς-Πέτερ Φρίντριχ ανακοίνωσε ότι η γερμανική κυβέρνηση θα αποστείλει στην αμερικανική κυβέρνηση κατάλογο με ερωτήματα σχετικά με την παρακολούθηση επικοινωνιών που πραγματοποιούσε επί μακρό χρονικό διάστημα η εθνική υπηρεσία ασφαλείας των ΗΠΑ.

Εικόνα

Η γερμανική κυβέρνηση πρόκειται να αποστείλει στην αντίστοιχη αμερικανική έναν κατάλογο με ερωτήματα σχετικά με την παρακολούθηση επικοινωνιών που πραγματοποιούσε επί μακρό χρονικό διάστημα η εθνική υπηρεσία ασφαλείας των ΗΠΑ ΝSA, όπως ανακοίνωσε σήμερα ο υπουργός Εσωτερικών Χανς-Πέτερ Φρίντριχ.

«Έχουμε ετοιμάσει έναν κατάλογο με ερωτήματα που θα διαβιβάσουμε στους Αμερικανούς φίλους μας» σχετικά με το πρόγραμμα υποκλοπών με την κωδική ονομασία PRISM, το οποίο αποβλέπει στην καταγραφή των επικοινωνιών χρηστών του Διαδικτύου σε εννέα μεγάλους ιστότοπους κοινωνικής δικτύωσης, όπως το Facebook, ανακοίνωσε ο Φρίντριχ με την ευκαιρία της παρουσίασης της ετήσιας έκθεσης των εσωτερικών υπηρεσιών πληροφόρησης VS.

«Πρόκειται να τους ρωτήσουμε ποιο είναι το εύρος της δραστηριότητας αυτής, γιατί υπήρξε αυτή η δραστηριότητα κι όταν θα έχουμε τις απαντήσεις θα σας τις διαβιβάσουμε. . . Πιθανότατα», δήλωσε ο Φρίντριχ, προκαλώντας γέλια στους δημοσιογράφους με την τελευταία του λέξη, που πρόφερε έπειτα από έναν μικρό δισταγμό.

Ο επικεφαλής της VS Χανς-Γκέοργκ Μάασεν, που ήταν επίσης παρών στην συνέντευξη Τύπου, διαβεβαίωσε πως δεν ήταν ενήμερος για το πρόγραμμα παρακολούθησης προτού το αποκαλύψουν οι εφημερίδες Ουάσιγκτον Ποστ και Γκάρντιαν.

Ο υπουργός υπενθύμισε πως κατά το παρελθόν η Γερμανία είχε δεχθεί «πολύ καλές και αξιόπιστες πληροφορίες» από τις αμερικανικές μυστικές υπηρεσίες που της είχαν επιτρέψει να «αποτρέψουν επιθέσεις στη Γερμανία», αλλά δεν ήταν σε θέση να επιβεβαιώσει εάν κάποιες από τις πληροφορίες αυτές είχαν συγκεντρωθεί χάρη στην παρακολούθηση από το PRISM.

«Οι Αμερικανοί δεν μας λένε από πού προέρχονται, κι εξάλλου κι εμείς δεν το λέμε στους εταίρους μας, όποτε έχουμε τέτοιου είδους σημαντικές πληροφορίες. Αυτός είναι ο τρόπος με τον οποίον λειτουργούν οι μυστικές υπηρεσίες», πρόσθεσε ο Φρίντριχ

Πηγή: skai.gr


Καλός οδηγός σημαίνει απαραίτητα τήρηση του ΚΟΚ.
Εικόνα
Άβαταρ μέλους
MacPap
Δημοσιεύσεις: 6896
Εγγραφή: 08 Ιούλ 2010, 03:00

Re: Tο Βερολίνο ζητάει εξηγήσεις από την Ουάσιγκτον για το P

Δημοσίευση από MacPap »

Αυτός είναι ο πληροφοριοδότης του Guardian για το PRISM


Στην αποκάλυψη του πληροφοριοδότη του, του ανθρώπου δηλαδή που έφερε στο φως όλα τα απόρρητα έγγραφα της αμερικανικής NSA και που μαρτυρούν το τεράστιο αμερικανικό σκάνδαλο παρακολούθησης PRISM, προχώρησε ο βρετανικός Guardian. Πρόκειται για τον Έντουαρ Σνόουντεν, έναν 29χρονο πρώην τεχνικό της CIA που ζήτησε ο ίδιος να κατονομαστεί γιατί όπως είπε δεν έχει τίποτα να κρύψει καθώς δεν έκανε τίποτα κακό. Ο Σνόουντεν, έχει βρει πλέον καταφύγιο στο Χονγκ Κονγκ, με την ελπίδα ότι θα του δοθεί άσυλο από μία χώρα με την οποία μοιράζεται κοινές αξίες.

Από την Guardian ολόκληρη η συνέντευξη!

Edward Snowden was interviewed over several days in Hong Kong by Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill.

Q: Why did you decide to become a whistleblower?

A: "The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife's phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.

"I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things … I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under."

Q: But isn't there a need for surveillance to try to reduce the chances of terrorist attacks such as Boston?

A: "We have to decide why terrorism is a new threat. There has always been terrorism. Boston was a criminal act. It was not about surveillance but good, old-fashioned police work. The police are very good at what they do."

Q: Do you see yourself as another Bradley Manning?

A: "Manning was a classic whistleblower. He was inspired by the public good."

Q: Do you think what you have done is a crime?

A: "We have seen enough criminality on the part of government. It is hypocritical to make this allegation against me. They have narrowed the public sphere of influence."

Q: What do you think is going to happen to you?

A: "Nothing good."

Q: Why Hong Kong?

A: "I think it is really tragic that an American has to move to a place that has a reputation for less freedom. Still, Hong Kong has a reputation for freedom in spite of the People's Republic of China. It has a strong tradition of free speech."

Q: What do the leaked documents reveal?

A: "That the NSA routinely lies in response to congressional inquiries about the scope of surveillance in America. I believe that when [senator Ron] Wyden and [senator Mark] Udall asked about the scale of this, they [the NSA] said it did not have the tools to provide an answer. We do have the tools and I have maps showing where people have been scrutinised most. We collect more digital communications from America than we do from the Russians."

Εικόνα
Snowden is a 29-year-old former technical assistant for the CIA

Q: What about the Obama administration's protests about hacking by China?

A: "We hack everyone everywhere. We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. We are not at war with these countries."

Q: Is it possible to put security in place to protect against state surveillance?

A: "You are not even aware of what is possible. The extent of their capabilities is horrifying. We can plant bugs in machines. Once you go on the network, I can identify your machine. You will never be safe whatever protections you put in place."

Q: Does your family know you are planning this?

A: "No. My family does not know what is happening … My primary fear is that they will come after my family, my friends, my partner. Anyone I have a relationship with …

I will have to live with that for the rest of my life. I am not going to be able to communicate with them. They [the authorities] will act aggressively against anyone who has known me. That keeps me up at night."

Q: When did you decide to leak the documents?

A: "You see things that may be disturbing. When you see everything you realise that some of these things are abusive. The awareness of wrong-doing builds up. There was not one morning when I woke up [and decided this is it]. It was a natural process.

"A lot of people in 2008 voted for Obama. I did not vote for him. I voted for a third party. But I believed in Obama's promises. I was going to disclose it [but waited because of his election]. He continued with the policies of his predecessor."

Q: What is your reaction to Obama denouncing the leaks on Friday while welcoming a debate on the balance between security and openness?

A: "My immediate reaction was he was having difficulty in defending it himself. He was trying to defend the unjustifiable and he knew it."

Q: What about the response in general to the disclosures?

A: "I have been surprised and pleased to see the public has reacted so strongly in defence of these rights that are being suppressed in the name of security. It is not like Occupy Wall Street but there is a grassroots movement to take to the streets on July 4 in defence of the Fourth Amendment called Restore The Fourth Amendment and it grew out of Reddit. The response over the internet has been huge and supportive."

Q: Washington-based foreign affairs analyst Steve Clemons said he overheard at the capital's Dulles airport four men discussing an intelligence conference they had just attended. Speaking about the leaks, one of them said, according to Clemons, that both the reporter and leaker should be "disappeared". How do you feel about that?


A: "Someone responding to the story said 'real spies do not speak like that'. Well, I am a spy and that is how they talk. Whenever we had a debate in the office on how to handle crimes, they do not defend due process – they defend decisive action. They say it is better to kick someone out of a plane than let these people have a day in court. It is an authoritarian mindset in general."

Q: Do you have a plan in place?

A: "The only thing I can do is sit here and hope the Hong Kong government does not deport me … My predisposition is to seek asylum in a country with shared values. The nation that most encompasses this is Iceland. They stood up for people over internet freedom. I have no idea what my future is going to be.

"They could put out an Interpol note. But I don't think I have committed a crime outside the domain of the US. I think it will be clearly shown to be political in nature."

Q: Do you think you are probably going to end up in prison?

A: "I could not do this without accepting the risk of prison. You can't come up against the world's most powerful intelligence agencies and not accept the risk. If they want to get you, over time they will."

Q: How to you feel now, almost a week after the first leak?

A: "I think the sense of outrage that has been expressed is justified. It has given me hope that, no matter what happens to me, the outcome will be positive for America. I do not expect to see home again, though that is what I want."
Καλός οδηγός σημαίνει απαραίτητα τήρηση του ΚΟΚ.
Εικόνα
Άβαταρ μέλους
MacPap
Δημοσιεύσεις: 6896
Εγγραφή: 08 Ιούλ 2010, 03:00

Re: Tο Βερολίνο ζητάει εξηγήσεις από την Ουάσιγκτον για το P

Δημοσίευση από MacPap »

Edward Snowden: how the spy story of the age leaked out

Συγνώμη για τα αγγλικά αλλά δεν έχω χρόνο να το μεταφράσω!


As he pulled a small black suitcase and carried a selection of laptop bags over his shoulders, no one would have paid much attention to Ed Snowden as he arrived at Hong Kong International Airport. But Snowden was not your average tourist or businessman. In all, he was carrying four computers that enabled him to gain access to some of the US government's most highly-classified secrets.

Today, just over three weeks later, he is the world's most famous spy, whistleblower and fugitive, responsible for the biggest intelligence breach in recent US history. News organisations around the globe have described him as "America's Most Wanted". Members of Congress have denounced him as a "defector" whose actions amount to treason and have demanded he be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

His supporters argue that his actions have opened up a much-needed debate on the balance between security and privacy in the modern world.

So is he whistleblower or traitor? That debate is still raging.

Snowden, aged 29, had flown to Hong Kong from Hawaii, where he had been working for the defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton at the National Security Agency, the biggest spy surveillance organisation in the world. Since Monday morning, he has gone underground. Hong Kong-based journalists, joined by the international press, have been hunting for him. At the height of the search, reporters recruited Twitter followers to see if they could successfully identify the lighting and other hotel furnishings shown in the video in which he went public. They did: the $330-a-night Mira Hotel, on Nathan Road, the busy main shopping drag in Kowloon district.

Knowing it was only a matter of time before he was found, Snowden checked out at lunchtime on Monday. It is thought he is now in a safe house.

What happens now? The US is on the verge of pressing criminal charges against him and that would lead to extradition proceedings, with a view to bringing him back to the US for trial and eventually jail.

If America is planning to jail for life Bradley Manning, who was behind the 2010 WikiLeaks release of tens of thousands of state department memos, what retribution lies in store for Snowden, who is guilty of leaking on a much bigger scale? The documents Manning released were merely "classified". Snowden's were not only "Top Secret", but circulation was extremely limited.

For an American, the traditional home for the kind of story Snowden was planning to reveal would have been the New York Times. But during extensive interviews last week with a Guardian team, he recalled how dismayed he had been to discover the Times had a great scoop in election year 2004 – that the Bush administration, post 9/11, allowed the NSA to snoop on US citizens without warrants – but had sat on it for a year before publishing.

Snowden said this was a turning point for him, confirming his belief that traditional media outlets could not be trusted. He looked around for alternative journalists, those who were both anti-establishment and at home with blogging and other social media. The member of this generation that he most trusted was the Guardian commentator Glenn Greenwald.

In January, Snowden reached out to a documentary filmmaker and journalist, Laura Poitras, and they began to correspond. In mid-February, he sent an email to Greenwald, who lives in Brazil, suggesting he might want to set up a method for receiving and sending encrypted emails. He even made a YouTube video for Greenwald, to take him step-by-step through the process of encryption. Greenwald did not know the identity of the person offering the leaks and was unsure if they were genuine. He took no action. In March, in New York, he received a call from Poitras, who convinced him that he needed to take this more seriously.

Greenwald and Snowden set up a secure communications system and the first of the documents arrived, dealing with the NSA's secret Prism programme, which gathers up information from the world's leading technology companies.

Greenwald flew to New York to talk to Guardian editors on 31 May; the next day, he and Poitras flew to Hong Kong. (I met the two for the first time in the New York office, accompanied them to Hong Kong and joined them in interviewing Snowden over the best part of a week, and writing articles based on the leaked documents and the interviews).

Neither Greenwald nor Poitras even knew what Snowden looked like. "He had some elaborate scheme to meet," Greenwald said. Snowden told him to go to a specific location on the third floor of the hotel and ask loudly for directions to a restaurant. Greenwald assumed Snowden was lurking in the background, listening in.

They went to a room that, Greenwald recalled, contained a large fake alligator. Snowden made himself known. He had told Greenwald that "I would know it was him because he would be carrying a Rubik's Cube".

Both Greenwald and Poitras were shocked the first time they saw the 29-year-old. Greenwald said:

I had expected a 60-year-old grizzled veteran, someone in the higher echelons of the intelligence service. I thought: 'This is going to be a wasted trip.'

After an hour of listening to Snowden, Greenwald changed his mind. "I completely believed him," he said.

The interviews were conducted in Snowden's room, which overlooked Kowloon Park. Snowden and the journalists, complete with camera equipment, crammed into the tiny space. He had been there for two weeks, having meals sent up. He did not have much with him: some clothes, a book, four computers, that Rubik's Cube. He was becoming worried about the costs and especially the chance that his credit cards would be blocked.

Even though he was well-versed in surveillance techniques, he would not have been hard to find – having signed in under his own name, using his own credit cards.

The interviews, combined with the leaked documents, provided the Guardian with four scoops in quick succession, from the court order showing that the US government had forced the telecoms giant Verizon to hand over the phone records of millions of Americans, to the previously undisclosed programme, Prism.

The Prism story was also published independently by the Washington Post after Poitras, a freelance journalist, had earlier approached the investigative reporter Barton Gellman, who took the story to the paper. Once on the ground working in Hong Kong, Poitras began worked with the Guardian team.

On Sunday, the story shifted from the leaks to the leaker. Snowden had from the start decided against anonymity and Poitras filmed him being interviewed by Greenwald for a video that would announce his outing.

Snowden's decision to go public has mystified many. Why come out? He had, he said, seen at first hand the impact on colleagues of leak inquiries involving anonymous sources and he did not want to put his colleagues through another ordeal


So what are the options available to him now? In the interviews, he praised Hong Kong as a place with a strong tradition of free speech and a working judicial system, in spite of having been returned to Chinese sovereignty. But these courts, judging by examples of past extradition cases, tend to lean towards being helpful towards the US.

Snowden would likely argue he is not guilty of a crime and claim the charges are politically motivated.

He has been hailed as a hero by some and a criminal by others. He was denigrated in columns in the New York Times and Washington Post. The Post columnist Richard Cohen, though he has never met Snowden, wrote: "He is not paranoiac; he is merely narcissistic." In the New York Times, David Brooks offered up psychological analysis, writing:

Though thoughtful, morally engaged and deeply committed to his beliefs, he appears to be a product of one of the more unfortunate trends of the age: the atomization of society, the loosening of social bonds, the apparently growing share of young men in their 20s who are living technological existences in the fuzzy land between their childhood institutions and adult family commitments.

On Sunday night, Snowden gave the last of what had been almost a week's worth of interviews. It was his final night in that hotel room: the final night before his old life gave way to a new and uncertain one. He sat on his bed, arms folded, television news on without the sound, and spoke about the debate he had started, homing in on a comment Obama had made on Friday, in response to the leaks.

"You can't have 100% security and then also have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience," the president said. Society had to make choices, he added.

Snowden challenged this, saying the problem was that the Obama administration had denied society the chance to have that discussion. He disputed that there had to be a trade-off between security and privacy, describing the very idea of a trade-off as a fundamental assault on the US constitution.

In what were to be the last words of the interview, he quoted Benjamin Franklin: "Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one."

Snowden recited it slowly. For him, it had a special resonance.

He has gone underground for now. But this saga is far from over.

Πηγή! Guardian
Καλός οδηγός σημαίνει απαραίτητα τήρηση του ΚΟΚ.
Εικόνα
Απάντηση

Επιστροφή στο “Ότι περισσεύει...”